I was recently involved in a couple of panel discussions on what it means to be a data scientist and to practice data science. These discussions/debates took place at IBM Insight in Las Vegas in Late October. I attendedÂ the event as IBM’sÂ guest. The panels, moderated by Brian Fanzo, included me and these data experts:
- Andrew C. Oliver, President of Mammoth Data
- Lillian PiersonÂ of Data-Mania
- Matt Ridings, CEOÂ of SideraWorks
- Mike Tamir, Chief Science Officer ofÂ Galvanize
IÂ enjoyed our discussions andÂ their take on the topic of data science. Our discussion was opened by the question “What is the role of a data scientist in the insight economy?” You can read eachÂ of our answers to this question on IBM’s Big Data Hub. While we come from different backgrounds, there was a common theme across our answers. We all think that data science is aboutÂ finding insights in data to help make better decisions. I offered a more complete answer to that question in a prior post. Today, I want to share some more thoughts about other areas of the field of data scienceÂ that we talked about in our discussions. The content below reflects my opinion.
What is aÂ Data Scientist?
As more data professionals are now calling themselves data scientists, it’s important to clarify exactly what a data scientist is. One way to understand data scientists is to understand what kind of skills they bring to bear on analytics projects. It’s generally agreed that a successful data scientist is one who possesses skills across three areas: subject matter expertise in a particular field, programming/technology and statistics/math (see DJ Patil and Hilary Mason’s take,Â Drew Conway’s Data Science Venn DiagramÂ (see Figure 1)Â and a review ofÂ many experts’ opinion on this topic.
AnalyticsWeek and I recently took an empirical approachÂ to understanding the skills of data scientists by asking over 500 data professionals about their job roles and their proficiency across 25Â data skills in five areas (i.e., business, technology, programming, math/modeling and statistics). A factor analysis of their proficiency ratings revealedÂ three factors: business acumen, technology/programming skills and statistics/math knowledge.
A data scientist who possesses expertise in all data skills is rare. In our survey, none of the respondents were experts in all five skill areas. Instead, our results identified four different types of data scientists, each with varying levels of proficiency inÂ data skills; as expected, different data professionals possessedÂ role-specific skills (see Figure 2). Business Management professionals were the most proficient in business skills. Developers were the most proficient in technology and programming skills. Researchers were most proficient in math/modeling and statistics. Creatives did not possessÂ great proficiencyÂ in any one skill.
The Practice of Data Science:Â Getting InsightsÂ from Data
Gil Press offers a great summary of the field of data science. He traces the literary history of the term (term first appears in use in 1974) and settles on the idea that data science is way of extracting insightsÂ from those data using the powers of computer science and statistics applied to data from a specific field of study.
But how do you get insights from data? Bernard Marr offers his 5-stepÂ SMART approachÂ to extract information. SMART stands for:
- S = Start with Strategy
- M = Measure Metrics and Data
- A = Apply Analytics
- R = Report Results
- T = Transform your Business
Another approach is the 6-step CRISP-DM (Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining) method (see Figure 3). In a KDNuggets Poll in 2014, the CRISP-DM method was the most popular methodologyÂ (43%)Â used byÂ data professionalsÂ for analytics, data mining, and data science projects.
These twoÂ approaches have a lot in common with each other and bothÂ share a lot with aÂ method that has been around for about 1000Â years: the scientific method (see Alhazen, a forerunner of the scientific method).Â The scientific method follows these generalÂ steps (see figure 4):
- Formulate a question or problem statement
- Generate a hypothesis that is testable
- Gather/Generate data to understand the phenomenon in question. Data can be generated through experimentation; when we can’t conduct true experiments, data are obtained through observations and measurements.
- Analyze data to test the hypotheses / Draw conclusions
- Communicate results to interested parties or take action (e.g., change processes) based on the conclusions. Additionally, the outcome of the scientific method can help us refine our hypotheses for further testing.
The value of data is measured by what you do with it. Whether you’reÂ investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge, the scientific method is an effective way to systematically interrogateÂ your data. Scientists may differ with respect to the variables they use and the problems they study (e.g.,Â medicine, education and business), but they all useÂ the scientific method to advance bodies of knowledge.
Data is, has been and forever will be at the heart of science. The scientific method necessarily involves the collection of empirical evidence, subject to specific principles of reasoning. That is the practice of science,Â a way of extracting knowledge from data. Data science is science.
The Democratization of Data Science
Taking a scientific approach to analyzing data is not only valuable toÂ data workers; it is also valuable for people who consume, interpret and make decisions based the analysis of those data. In business, data users need to think critically about sales reports, social media metrics and quarterly reports. Application vendors are marketing their toolsÂ and platforms as a way of making everybody a data scientist, enablingÂ end users (i.e., data users) to get advanced statistical and visualization capabilities to find insights (see Prelert’s take on thisÂ here, Tableau’s ideasÂ here and Umbel’s call here).
I believe that the democratization of data science is not only a software problem but also an education problem. Companies need to provide their employees training on statistics and statistical concepts. This type of training gives the employees the ability to think critically about the data (e.g., dataÂ source, measurement properties and relevanceÂ of the metrics). The better the grasp of statistics employeesÂ have, the more insight/value/use they will get from the software they use to analyze/visualize that data.
Statistics is the language of data. Like knowledge of your native language helps you maneuver in the world of words, statistics will help you maneuver in the world ofÂ data. As the world around us becomes more quantified, statistical skills will become more and more essential in our daily lives. If you want to make sense of our data-intensive world, you will need to understand statistics.
Conclusions and Final Thoughts
Businesses are relying on data professionals with unique skills to makeÂ sense of their data. These data professionals apply their skills to improve decision-making in humans or algorithms.Â Getting from data to insights, data professionals can adopt a systematic approach to optimize the use of their skills. Following are some conclusions about data scientists and the practice of data science.
- The practice of data science requires three skills: subject matter expertise, computing skills and statistical knowledge.
- The general term, ‘data scientist,’ is ambiguous. Our research studied fourÂ different types of data scientists: Business management, Programmer, Creative and Researcher. Each role possessed different strengths.
- Science is a way of thinking, a way of testing ideas using data. An effective practice of data science includes the scientific method. I think that the term, ‘data science,’ is redundant. It’s just science. Science requires the use of data, data to help you understand your business and how the world really works.
- OfferÂ employeesÂ training on statistics. Giving people analytics software and expecting them to excel at
datascience is like giving them a stethescope and expecting them to excel at medicine. The better they understand the language of data, the more value they will get from the analytics software they use.
I’ll leave you with some thoughts on data science I shared with Nick Dimeo at IBM Insight.
I would love to hear your thoughts on data scientists and the practice of data science. What do those terms mean to you?